Wednesday, 3 August 2016

XEX 606-1 is 50


XEX 606-1 is 50

 
For those of you scratching your heads about this strange number or thinking this has become a science fiction robot blog, the next paragraph is for you.

XEX 606 -1 is the matrix number for the second side of Revolver, a code used to identify the metal parts in the physical production that is stamped or inscribed on  the lead out (also known as the dead wax) area of the record. All companies used them with varying types of numbers, letters and shapes, some of which are still in dispute today over what they meant. However, we do know a lot about the EMI / Parlophone matrix numbers. XEX indicates it’s a mono record (YEX is stereo). 606 is the individual number given to this side of the record (side one is 605, Rubber Soul is 579 for side 1 & 580 for side 2). -1 means that it’s the first lacquer cut from the master tapes. (However, that doesn’t mean it’s necessarily the first used in production, the first mono Help album has -2 on both sides, indicating there was a problem with the first lacquers).
 
Revolver side 2 Matrix numbers in the dead wax area for first (above) and corrected pressing (below)
 

Now we’ve straitened that out, let us begin…
 

So halfway through making a new album, in a studio you didn’t want to use because of its outdated technology and a stuffy antiquated management system that was slow to react to change, with an expired record contract and on the verge of ceasing all live work, it’s hard to imagine a band delivering what many consider to be the greatest album of all time. Even on its release, Paul McCartney was worried that it sounded out of tune. The initial mono lp’s had the wrong mix on the final track of side 2, the official mono mix, used on all subsequent mono pressings of Revolver is Mix 8 made from the 3rd Take; the initial mono pressings used Mix 11 from the same Take.



 
The Beatles had been keen to improve the sound of their songs, listening to Tamla Motown singles which had so much more bass on them, they pushed for more bottom end on the Paperback Writer single. Having used another speaker as a microphone to record the bass for both this and the B side “Rain”, EMI Management baulked when the mix came up to be mastered and cut on to lacquers. There were very strict EMI regulations when it came to how loud and how much bass could be put onto a record, too much would make a stylus jump and lead to product returns. Fortunately the ATOC machine had arrived at Abbey Road in 1966; Automatic Transient Overload Control (Serial number TG1230) had been acquired and adapted to the company’s unusual Impedance & Line levels of 200 ohms and was being used for “Paperback Writer” & “Rain”. Used in conjunction with an advance play head it could predict louder passages of music ahead and leave large spaces between the grooves.

 

The single would serve as a warning shot for the sonic changes ahead, recorded with Geoff Emerick taking over as engineer, his preference for the Fairchild 660 limiter on the drums and miking the snare drum from underneath made a dramatic difference to Ringo’s drum sound. Geoff also dampened the bass drum using a 4 headed sweater that was made for a publicity shot to promote “Eight Arms To Hold You”; the original title of the film “Help”. The use of Studio 3 at Abbey Road would also bring some changes of sound, although whether the use of this this was due to scheduling conflicts or a conscious decision to get new sounds is a matter of debate. The Beatles wanted to record a new album in Memphis Tennessee, the original plan was to record at the Stax Studio with in house producer Jim Stewart, however EMI, who had studios over the world at this point, were in no mood to hand over their cash to a rival studio. So in April 66, the Beatles headed back to Abbey Road, and while the Paperback Writer / Rain single would be recorded in studio 3, only 9 out of the albums 32 tracking days would be spent in the smaller studio, the rest would be in the usual Studio 2. Both of these studios were equipped with Studer J-37 four track tape recorders and REDD.51 recording consoles. Another change for 1966 was the prevention of leakage (ahem, alright at the back settle down) as Geoff Emerick used more screens around the guitar amps to reduce the amount of sound escaping to other microphones. Also, something that is taken for granted in studios now, was the use of headphones. Prior to this monitoring was done by a speaker placed at 90 degrees to the microphone so that the artist can hear the playback while doing overdubs but reducing the audio spill onto the recording by placing it in the microphone’s “blind spot” (deaf spot just doesn’t make sense as a general analogy, although in microphone terms that’s what it is). Due to its colour and size the speaker cabinet used for this in Abbey Road was lovingly referred to as the “White Elephant” and you can hear its effects clearly on the track “Yesterday”. In 1965 Paul recorded the first vocal on track 3 (along with acoustic guitar on track 2) on the 14th of June, on the 17th after the recording of the string quartet on track 1, George Martin suggested that Paul could try another vocal take on the empty track 4. After Paul gave it a go, Martin thought the original vocal take was better with the exception of the section “something wrong, now I long for yesterday” at about 52 seconds into the track. This part is from the second take on track four which has the white elephant monitor vocal from track three spilling over onto it creating a double track vocal effect. Double tracking vocals was something The Beatles had done since the early days and it had become a standard to re-record a second vocal, a process that irked John who begged George Martin to find an easier way. Engineer Ken Townsend came up with ADT (Artificial Double Tracking) using Abbey Road’s existing technology, splitting the original vocal and sending one on a journey to another tape machine slightly delaying the signal on the return, (for the technically interested it was a BTR2 tape machine running at 30ips with the record & playback head twice the distance apart of the J-37 heads) creating the audio illusion of two vocal parts. The process was tested first during a Cilla Black session before being unveiled to The Beatles, clearly they loved it and tried using it on everything and ADT was quickly snapped up by every Abbey Road engineer shortly after. You can easily hear an ADT second vocal on Beatles stereo recordings as they are always panned hard to the left. You can hear it being switched off on the stereo version of Eleanor Rigby, during the first verse, the first two syllables of Eleanor have the ADT switched on, on the “nor” it disappears from the left channel (Yet another shoddy stereo mix). A further innovation was “Varispeed”. Since the first album the Beatles with George Martin had utilised running the tapes at half speed for recording (the piano part on Misery), but now by using a variable voltage oscillator to control the speed of the tape, smaller and subtler changes were possible. “Rain” was recorded at normal speed (50 cycles per second) and slowed down to record the vocals (42 cps) and mixed at 44 cps, giving the backing track a rich timbre and shifting Lennon’s vocal up a semitone. Several other tracks for Revolver were slowed down “I’m Only Sleeping “,” For No One” and “She Said She Said”, however the majority of Varispeed adjusted recordings would be speeded up on future Beatle recordings.  

 

The story of XEX 606-1 begins before Paperback Writer & Rain were recorded, on the 6th April 1966, The Beatles began their first song since 1965’s “Girl”, it was a Lennon track with the working title of “Mark 1” (John had also called the song “The Void”) which was influenced by Timothy Leary’s book “The Psychedelic Experience: A Manuel based on the Tibetan Book Of The Dead”. John’s original idea was to have thousands of monks chanting the lyrics; while Paul brought in the more practical idea of creating tape loops which were played simultaneously on other machines and mixed onto track 2 of Take 3 (Take 1 has been subsequently released on the second Anthology album). There are 5 distinct loops, 1 a laughing male voice speeded up (seagull sound), 2 a B flat minor chord played by an orchestra, 3 a sitar phrase reversed and played at double speed, 4 a phrase played either on a mandolin or acoustic guitar speeded up, 5 a scaler sitar line, reversed and speeded up.

 John demoted the monks idea to wanting himself to sound like the Dali Lama, somehow this technically transformed itself into breaking into either a Lesley speaker cabinet or the internal “Lesley” type rotating speaker on a Lowery Heritage DSO-1 organ that had already been used for guitar on Take 1 of Tomorrow Never Knows (Mark 1).  Work continued on the track on 22nd of April in Studio 2 with a new second vocal, tambourine, organ, piano and guitar solo crammed onto track 3. Track 1 had drums & bass, while track 4 had new lead vocal and a tamboura (It’s correct name is a Tanpura  and is the first instrument you hear on Tomorrow Never Knows, it looks like a fretless sitar.)

 
27th of April - nine mono mixes of “Mark 1” were made in Studio 3 by George Martin & Geoff Emerick.

6th of June two further mono mixes of what was now called “Tomorrow Never Knows” were made in Studio 3 by George Martin & Geoff Emerick, numbered 10 and 11. Number 11 was considered the best mix and was to be used for the mono album.

 
This is where things get fuzzy, according to most Beatles sources, this happened -

14th July, the day the cutting (creating the lacquer from the master tapes) for the album's manufacturing began, George Martin telephoned engineer Geoff Emerick to have Tomorrow Never Knows Mix eleven replaced with mix eight from 27 April. Despite this some copies of the alternative mix leaked out.

Now if this was true, all initial UK copies of Revolver would have the XEX 606-2 matrix on side 2, or the XEX 606-1 copies would have Mix 8 on them. Neither of these is true.

 How would leaked copies of the wrong mix get out if they hadn’t been manufactured yet?

The cutting process starts with creating a lacquer, made from playing the master tapes into the cutting lathe that creates the disc that would have been sent to the EMI Hayes factory for production. To get from this stage to the stamper which is used to press the records is at the very least half a day’s work, the existence of 606-1 with Mix 11 means that the lacquer would have either been already created or that the date of the call is wrong. From the additional deadwax information on my copy of Revolver I can see that this was created from the 4th Mother (these are used to create the stampers – for a more in depth look at this process please avert your eyes to http://www.adam-ant.net/vinyl.html ) this would suggest that it would have taken even longer to get the factory tooled up to start pressing. The plating process takes around 45 minutes and the quality control for each stage can take an hour of groove inspection under the microscope. There are suggestions from some sources that when George Martin made the call the presses where immediately stopped. Due to the fact the George was no longer head of A&R and working freelance, it’s unlikely was in a position to make that call that could have cost thousands (in 1966) of pounds in loss of waste materials and time.

The most likely explanation is that while George Martin and Geoff Emerick may have preferred mix 11 at the time it was created, subsequently some or all of The Beatles with George Martin may have preferred mix 8. The Mix Eleven version which they would have heard on the initial pressings that came from the factory was brought to the attention of Martin (some say it was John that let him know). It was then a new lacquer was cut (606-2) that contained Mix 8, which was used for all subsequent pressings (including the Mono 2014 reissue) but instantly creating another Beatles rarity (606-1).

So exactly how rare is 606-1. It does depend on how many were made, sadly I don’t have access to EMI archives, although hopefully when Mark Lewisohn (who may have access) finishes his mammoth Beatles Project (The Beatles: All These Years http://www.marklewisohn.net/ ) this might get cleared up. Until then, let’s try to do some maths.

The EMI Hayes factory in the sixties had approximately 120 presses, giving it the ability to press a massive 120,000 records per day.

Estimates vary on how many records each stamper would make, for EMI they seem to range between 1000 & 5000 per stamper.

The mono to stereo ratio pressed also seems hard to pin down; estimates again go from 90%/10% (mono/stereo) to 80%/20% for this time period.

From the dead wax of my copy I can see that this is from the 41st stamper created.

Revolver had advanced orders of 300,000 in the UK

Using the most conservative figures, this means that if my copy was one of the last pressed there would have been 41,000 copies produced; to fulfil the advanced mono orders (90%) would have required 270,000, meaning at the absolute least 606-1 makes up over 15% of all advanced copies produced. No one has worked harder that Bruce Spizer on researching Beatles record production at Hayes, his sources which are from people who worked at the factory at the time, suggest as many as 5000 records were produced from a stamper unless they broke down. Using my smallest estimate, it’s inconceivable that EMI would simply trash 41,000 copies because someone signed off the wrong mix of a track. If Bruce’s numbers are more accurate, the word rare will take on its eBay meaning. It may be there are a lot more copies out there than anyone realises, so I’d be wary of parting with large sums for it.
 
Revolver is the first Beatles album to have a single catalogue number for both Mono & Stereo. The two are differentiated by the prefix PMC (Mono) and PCS (Stereo)

While a very good copy of the revised Revolver (606-2) will set you back around £30, a similarly graded version of 606-1 could set you back £150. Is it worth it? Well there are some who prefer this mix, although I would disagree, but don’t take my word for it, here it is for free on You Tube.


 
For an album that was recorded 50 years ago, it sounds like it could have been recorded in early 2016. If you don't have a vinyl copy my advice is to buy the mono re-issue (2014) for maximum quality at a sensible price.  Revolver set new standards for production which last to today and make it the Beatles album that is least likely to age. The Beatles would conclude their live era at Candlestick Park later in the month and sign a new EMI contract in early 67, even after some reassurance about the tuning, Paul summed it up “I think it'll be our best album yet. They'll never be able to copy this!”

 


 Sources –

Beatles For Sale On Parlophone Records - Bruce Spizer & Frank Daniels

Recording The Beatles - Kevin Ryan and Brian Kehew.

The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions – Mark Lewisohn

Here, There and Everywhere: My Life Recording the Music of the Beatles – Geoff Emerick

 

Friday, 29 July 2016

So you want to buy East Side Story


So you want to buy East Side Story

 


Squeeze’s 4th and arguably their finest album was released just over 35 (count em) years ago, at the time peaking at a disappointing 19 in the albums charts, despite critical acclaim and subsequent re-evaluation it’s strangely noticeable by its absence in record racks that are brimming with re-issues of lesser mortals.

Originally conceived as a double album with a different producer for each side, names such as Dave Edmunds & Paul McCartney being bounded about, along with Nick Lowe (who produced the first track on the album) and Elvis Costello, who produced the rest of the album with Roger Bechirian, eventually ended up as a single disc. But what a disc it is.

A Porky Prime Cut
 

Side A: kicks off with "In Quintessence" , a song that quickly marks that this is a new Squeeze that has completed it’s severing of New Wave links that started on the previous “Argybargy” LP. "Someone Else's Heart" with Chris Difford’s vulnerable vocal a million miles away from the cheeky cockney “Cool For Cats” invokes the same Motown soul take that Elvis used on his 1979 LP “Get Happy”, with some added disco moves on John Bentley’s bass and a hard “Revolver” style backing vocal from Glenn Tilbrook that evoke a bleak outlook on relationships. Jools Holland’s replacement Paul Carrack, the man with the golden voice, leads vocal duties on "Tempted" with the added “Four Tops” vocals from Glenn, Chris and Costello. "Piccadilly" with its clever chord changes is more of Glenn at his song writing best, while “There's No Tomorrow" with its 66 psychedelic vibe leaves you in no doubt that the punk days are over. "Heaven" returns Chris’ vocal to his usual range with its striking out of tune chorus that adds to the whole unsettling feel of this song. The first side closes with the bitter sweet “Woman's World", another masterclass of chords and melody, beautifully complementing Difford’s wry lyrics.
 
 
 
Side 2 wastes no time with the urgent "Is That Love", Beatley without over-fabing the flaming pie. "F-Hole" is East Side Story’s “Tomorrow Never Knows”, pretty much as far from “Up The Junction” as Squeeze had got to this point, which beautifully segues into “Labelled With Love" . County & Weston was a dirty phrase back in 1981 for pop music, however Squeeze and Costello (who would start to record his own country album “Almost Blue” at the time of this album’s release) would confront this prejudice with mild success. Eventually released as a single, it’s fine lyric and melody got it to number 4 in the UK charts.  



Difford & Tilbrook were sometimes referred to as the Lennon & McCartney on the late 70’s & 80’s and songs like the Lennonesque “Someone Else's Bell" certainly did nothing to change that idea. Clever chord changes and melodic limbo aplenty on the marvellous “Mumbo Jumbo" certainly highlight again one of the finest song writing teams of this era. As if that wasn’t enough, the stunning orchestral "Vanity Fair" is beyond words, if you haven’t heard it take a listen here, and bring your tissues.



The album closes with "Messed Around", a shot over the bows to the departed Jools Holland. Glenn Tillbrook admitted  "There was definitely a feeling of 'See what you're missing out on Jools. Look at all the fun you could be having.”

So having built up what I will admit is one of my favourite albums, don’t go rushing out just yet. Since the initial release it 1981, it has not had a vinyl re-issue, with the exemption of a US 1988 repress. Good copies of the ordinal UK A&M pressing can be picked up for reasonable (£5 - £10) on Discogs.

When an album is a good as this, it deserves to be on the shelves and elbowing re-issues of the Human League and ABC out of the way.

 

Sunday, 19 June 2016

The Who Polydor Singles Box Set



The Who Polydor Singles Box Set

After being put back several times, the concluding singles box set has finally arrived. It's a surprise on a few levels, the first being it's the largest tome of the four singles boxes, weighing in at 15 singles. The second being the time span, 1975 to 2015, that's 40 years! Although strictly speaking only 12 of those were Poydor years, and even one of the singles in that time period is a MCA release. The first three sets have made it into the essential purchase category, but surely this collection where A and B sides were culled from the last 5 studio and several live LP's render this set a vanity piece?

Let's take a listen, there are more surprises on the way...



1 - See Me, Feel Me - Listening To You / Overture
In true shambolic Who style, this box set kicks off with a single that wasn't even a Who release. Credited to Roger Daltrey & Chorus, the Tommy finale always sounded slightly abandoned in single form on my original (pictured left), and despite the abandonment of a picture sleeve with this disc, the better sounding Abbey Road Half Mastered re-issue here still sounds like a weird choice of single from the Tommy movie soundtrack. The B side however more than makes up for it, credited to Pete Townshend, this alternative Overture has an energy and zeal that is often missing from the soundtrack. This version later appeared on the CD re-issue of Ken Russell's colouful re-imagined Tommy, but here it sounds better than ever.



2 - Squeeze Box / Success Story
Like the latter track singles from the last box set, the original plastic injection labels of the 70's and 80's (foreground above) are no longer feasible along with the teeth that surround the label, these enabled the stacking on automatic turntables to stop the singles slipping on top of one another (playlist - old school). However, like the preceding singles sets, these are Half Speed Mastered at Abbey Road and in all but one case sound superior to the originals. Both of these songs were taken from the Who By Numbers LP and Squeeze Box is a song worn thin by compilations albums, live versions and varying degrees of shoddy covers at your local jam night. So I'm surprised just how fresh it sounds in single form here, with Roger's vocals in particular sounding like he's singing in my lounge.




3 - Who Are You / Had Enough
In previous sets I've bemoaned the lack of some of the original single mixes, fear not, this time we are all present and correct with the single edit of Who Are You here in all it's glory. I mean, that's the point of issuing these singles, right?




4 - Long Live Rock / I'm The Face - My Wife (live)
5 - 5:15 / I'm One
Tied in to the movies The Kids Are Alright & Quadrophenia, these singles from their respective films fill some well deserved gaps. Long Live Rock, originally from the "Odds & Sods" compilation which is absent from the re-issue program, sounds better than I've heard it elsewhere. Whilst the B side I'm The Face isn't quite up to the reissue of the Fontana version (from the Brunswick Box), possible due to vying for vinyl space with a live version of "My Wife". As with any single or EP, to get a more tracks or time on it you have to reduce the volume as you are cutting the grooves closer together. The live version of My Wife that follows it was recorded at the highly regarded 77 Kilburn Show.
5:15 is the remixed and re-recorded bass version along with the remixed I'm One that John prepared for the Quadrophenia soundtrack album in 1979.




6 - You Better You Bet / The Quiet One
Again the single mix on the A side, although both the single & album versions were available on the original releases, I know because I have both. The disc pictured top right is the original single mix version, to the left is the rear cover of an album version, both were pressed in England. While below is the cover for the vastly superior sounding Poydor Box Set single.




7 - Don't Let Go The Coat / You
Many an evening in the eighties we would argue that this was the worst Who single ever. It isn't as we shall see shortly, however it's certainly worth moving swiftly onto the B side to listen too one of John's best recorded bass sounds on record.




8 - Athena /  A Man Is A Man
One of the most underrated Who singles in my opinion, I always thought it came alive in single format and it doesn't disappoint here. Pictured here with the original above and the rather elegant but noisy picture disc beside it.




9 - Eminence Front / It's Your Turn
Whilst this release never got off the cutting lathe, one of the finest moments of It's Hard continues to make appearances on TV shows and in sports arenas to this day. Yet again John's bass sounds HUGE and as with all these singles, the drums sound and feel like drums. Issued in this box set for the first time with the original planned artwork.




10 - Twist & Shout / I Can't Explain
You know that worst single discussion I mentioned earlier, well this is where the arguing stopped. This is the sort of thing that artists do to fulfil their contracts. Not a Polydor release, here are both versions on the MCA label, with the spanking new and better sounding disc below.




11 - Won't Get Fooled Again / Bony Moronie
The single edit version that was re-released in 1988 to go with yet another compilation (Who's Better, Who's Best). Like the version on the Track box set I prefer the original single release, it just seems to have more presence and dynamics.  The B side Bony Moronie was at the time a glimpse into the archives, recorded at one of the Young Vic Lifehouse shows which has been subsequently released on CD. Whilst it's a rough & tumble version, it's never sounded so good as it does here. My neighbours think the Who have moved in. 




12 - Join Together (live) / I Can See For Miles (live) - Behind Blue Eyes (live)
Surprisingly better than you thought, yes the 25th Anniversary tour was a kind of Vegas cast of thousands approach, but the extra dynamics here that are missing from the thin CD album, along with the first two songs being an unusual inclusion into your usual bog standard OO set, that leaves a pleasant taste on the ear palate.

What is clear at this point if you've been following Matt Kent's rather fine liner notes in the booklet that accompanies this set, is that along with the 7" releases, there were some 12" versions that had some sexier track options than some of the offerings here. Rather than another single edit of Won't Get Fooled Again that was re-released in the Track box, maybe the live version of Dancing In The Street; recorded Dec 79 and taken from the same single 12", would have been a preferable substitute? Like previous sets, authenticity has generally ruled over diversity, you could make good arguments for either but I'll let the former have it's day here.




13 - Real Good Looking Boy / Old Red Wine
14 - Wire & Glass EP, Six Songs From A Mini-Opera / Mirror Door
Real Good Looking Boy in it's edited form sounded so good on the Who Hits 50 Lp that I was really looking forward to this single with the full version, it didn't disappoint. Both this and the flip have so much more dynamics than the digital release versions, that really hit you where it feels good. Anyone who thought the Who's recording career was over were kicked in the gooleys by the Wire & Glass EP. The single edit of the Six Songs from a Mini-Opera and the original, albeit substandard mix (compared to the album version) of Mirror Door are all present here in glorious analogue, and sound better for it too.




15 - Be Lucky / I Can't Explain
Originally released as a one sided 7" single (top right) and then as a blue vinyl record store day version (top left) backed with I Can't Explain, the new Abbey Road Half Speed Mastered single in this Poydor Boxset  sounds better than it's 2 fore-bearers, the guitar in particular cuts through the house like a axe windmilling madman.

Before it hit the mat, I was pretty sure this set was not going to make the essential purchase standard of the first three. I was wrong, and this package, like the others, continues to show the real validity and power of the single. The Who's 7 inch body of work is just as every bit essential as their album output, if you don't have these sets then you are missing out on the quality & fidelity of The Who, warts an all.





So to neatly wrap up The Who's Single Boxset Re-Issues:-

Often heard argument 1 - The Who are an album band.
Answer - Wrong, go to the beginning and start again. (Brunswick, Reaction, Track review)

Often heard argument 2 - I bought them the first time round.
Answer - With a couple of exceptions, these sound vastly superior to the original pressings.

The Who's single's box sets are a triumph.









Thursday, 19 May 2016

Abbey Road Half Speed Mastering


Abbey Road Half Speed Mastering

 

It may not have escaped your attention that some of the releases I’ve recently championed (The Zombies Odessey & Oracle & The Who’s Brunswick Box Set being two) have been half speed mastered at Abbey Road. 


Six new releases have just been released and for reasons that will shortly be clear, The Police’s 1981 LP Ghost In The Machine has joined two other copies in my collection.

 

Like many other topics I pick up on, Half Speed Mastering is nothing new, even before Mobile Fidelity made it their standard practice in 1977, DECCA records had already been using the process for some of its classical output for nearly twenty years. As the name describes, you run the master tape at half speed, if it runs at 30 inches per second ( ips) you play it back at 15ips while the cutting lathe runs at 16 2/3 rpm. There are some well-known issues with this process, low end roll off and more difficult de-essing being two. Low end roll off means losing some bass at the deeper end of the sound spectrum and de-essing being a way of correcting the distortion on vocal sounds using “S” and “T”. 


A&M Pressing

Trying to improve on Ghost In The Machine is certainly a tall order, the original album (released on A&M) sounds terrific and I remember listening to it on my friends Dads posh hifiback in the early eighties, being mesmerised that recorded music could sound so good. 



Four or five years ago, I picked up a second hand copy that was released on the Nautilus Recordings label, released the same year as the original it was half speed mastered and marketed as a “Super Discs – Listen To The Difference”. Having read lots of conflicting opinions on the benefits of half speed mastering I thought it would be interesting to hear it for myself. Supposedly, by running the lathe slower it has more time to accurately cut the groove, whilst this sounds like it should make sense it could also be audio snake oil. Now this version certainly sounded better, I thought the bass had more clarity and the treble seemed crisper. Whether this was down to being mastered at half speed or just being mastered with more care and superior equipment, there is no clear evidence to say, but I’m happy to reap the benefits either way. 



The new Abbey Road half speed masters have somewhat controversially been using hi-res digital masters to cut the new re-issues. Mike Showell who oversees the half speed masters has spoken about why he feels that using new hi-res digital copies of the original master tapes to make these records is superior to cutting directly from tape-

The greatest variable in all of this is the replay of the master on the tape machine. Just about all of the limitations of analogue cutting from tape are made twice as bad at half-speed. For this reason I firmly believe careful and sympathetic high-resolution digital capture from a well-cared for and customised (i.e. improved) American tape machine will ultimately yield better sounding records which is the sole reason for this series of releases. There is no perfect solution, but I feel by some distance this is the best way to proceed.

Mike Showell talking with Michael Fremer

For full interview visit http://www.analogplanet.com/content/ume-abbey-road-12-speed-mastered-series-update-we-ask-tough-questions#Hj2hydyik4hexebC.97

 


Well the proof of the audio is in the listening, so after listening to the Nautilus version I pop the new Abbey Road version on the turn table. It’s a revelation. Virtually all the bass sounds deeper and clearer, everything sounds more defined and it still retains a real “depth” of sound over the rather flat sounding CD version. Whilst the improvements to the treble are quite subtle, they become more obvious on the soundscape intro to “Secret Journey”. The dynamics seem improved too, the explosive start of the chorus of “Invisible Sun” sounds bigger than ever. 

From what I’ve heard so far from the Abbey Road Mastering Team I’m mightily impressed and thoroughly recommend these re-issues.




Wednesday, 4 May 2016

Concentric Grooves

Concentric Grooves



Those who first purchased Monty Python’s Matching Tie and Handkerchief album in 1973 were in for several surprises when they pulled the album out of the sleeve. After the first shock of the aforementioned male accessories being attached to a dead man, lovingly created by Terry Gilliam on the inner sleeve, the purchaser then had the record label to contend with having both sides labelled “FREE RECORD, given away with Monty Python’s Matching Tie and Handkerchief - Side 2”. After listening to both sides and having a good chuckle, it would be neatly filed away for next time. When it did return to the turntable to be replayed, it may then have been an amazed listener who was hearing a completely different recording of Python material.*

How could this be? 
The concentric groove.


The Concentric groove, sometimes called a double or parallel groove is simply more than one groove that is cut into the disc (think of the difference between a single carriageway road and the lanes on the M25, maybe it would be a more interesting motorway if it just spiralled in on Central London) and depending on where the needle lands in the leadoff area you will hear one of whatever that groove contains. Whilst on this Python offering this was kept quiet, probably for the self-amusement of the team, concentric grooves were often marketed as a selling point. The earliest example is a 1901 78rpm on the Victor label, demonstrated on this You Tube video.


 
 Since the 30’s various “Horse Racing” games have employed the double groove to bring in the random element that you can bet money on.  Examples of which can be seen here http://www.ankitoner.com/gramolud/gramolud_cavalls.htm
 
The first vinyl release I can find is a 7” 45rpm on the RCA Victor label by “The Fontane Sisters” called “Fortune Teller Song”. Released in 1951, on what became known at the time as magic records, this contains four different endings depending on which of the four grooves your stylus fell into. 

The earliest stereo records were also produced using concentric grooves and a special double stylus; one groove had the right channel and the rest you can work out for yourself. These were little more than test pressings that were quickly superseded by the single stereo groove in 1957. 



The first concentric groove record I bought was on a 12” 45rpm. “Pop Music” by  “M” was released in 1979, side 1 contained the A side “Pop Music” and  the B side “M Factor” on the coin flip concentric groove which must have driven DJ’s mad. Side two had a single groove with a disco mix of “Pop Music” (bravo chaps).
 
Throughout the eighties various 7, 10 and 12 inch records were released with various combinations of concentric groove. The prize for the most however goes to the octo-groove flexi disc issued with Mad Magazine in 1980. It’s not Lennon & McCartney standard song writing, but hats off for getting 8 grooves on a flexi disc.  
 


 
 
The latest and bravest use of a concentric groove is on Side 2 of Jack White’s Lazaretto, which for the first song starts off on concentric grooves, giving you either an acoustic or electric intro before the stylus is corralled into a single groove for the rest of the song. It almost works! With the acoustic version it plays through fine, only with the electric intro is there a small repeat of the word “just”, but full marks for effort. It would have worked better if the whole track was on concentric grooves and merged quietly between the banding. 




However many grooves you find, enjoy them, and if nothing else, next time a smart alec tries to assert their cleverness on you with the question "how many grooves are there on a record" you can tell them.

 
 
*This was only on the real second side of the original pressings and it’s quite plausible that it could have taken many more plays to discover this extra material. In fact there may be some who still haven’t discovered this. 

Matching Tie & Handkerchief on the Charisma Label
Side 1 - Matrix / Runout (Runoff A): CAS 1080 A-1U
Side 2 - Matrix / Runout (Runoff B): CAS 1080 B-1U A PORKY RAY ADVENTURE
And yes, Porky Ray is the infamous George "Porky" Peckham, one of the finest master disc cutters in the land.

 

Wednesday, 20 April 2016

A Digital Record...?

A digital record…?



All analogue (often referred to as a triple A release) is the holy grail of most vinyl record enthusiasts, recorded on multi-track tape, mastered on tape and directly cut to the lacquer that is used to make a record. During the seventies some records were cut directly onto the lacquer, called direct to disc recording”, bypassing the tape hiss accumulated on the multi-track & and master tape stages. Cutting direct to disc was nothing new, it was used prior to the early fifties before the invention of tape to make 78 shellac records, however this time it was a very niche market featuring mainly jazz & classical titles and pretty much died a death by the eighties, despite the odd resurrection here & there since. 




By the late seventies, digital recording was seen as the future and a more useable alternative to direct to disc in terms of eradicating tape hiss. The first major record to be recorded this way was Ry Cooder's Bop ‘Til You Drop”, on a 32 track digital tape machine built by 3M. Today most new releases are recorded digitally and some like David Crosby’s last solo album “Croz” sound amazing. 
 




In 1983 Joe Jackson was lamenting the sound of modern albums, often recorded in isolation (one instrument at a time) in a heavily dampened room; they lacked the acoustic ambience of the great studios such as 30th Street Columbia Studio in NYC & Abbey Road in London. Joe searched high and low over New York trying to find an appropriate sonic haven, eventually settling on an old Masonic Lodge that was used by Vanguard Studios for classical recordings. After a painstaking 3 days of rejecting various digital recording equipment, Joe settled on a 3m 4 track machine to record most of the instrumentation live over a 3 week period, the vocals then being recorded at Atlantic’s Studio B on 60th Street. Whilst this digital process delivered one of the better sounding early Compact Discs, due to it not requiring to go through the thin and crispy sounding Analogue to Digital converters that plagued early cd releases, it is on record that this album is highly prized by audiophiles and music lovers. On songs “The Verdict” & “Be My Number Two” they show off the magnificent sound of the room, the latter as it moves from quiet piano and voice to a full on band in less than moments revolution of the turntable will certainly test your audio equipment to its limit. The scraper intro on “Cha Cha Loco” is reminiscent of test records such as “Persuasive Perfusion”, the wonderful dynamics of “Loisaida and “Heart Of Ice” are all brutally squashed & compressed on the remastered 1997 CD. It is on record they breathe like music should. 


I understand and certainly agree that where possible analogue tapes should be used, The Beatles Mono reissues & the recently reviewed 2016 Beach Boys “Pet Sounds” are testament to this, however it is possible to make a great sounding digital album.




Big World – Joe’s 1986 follow up album did away with the multi-tracking stage and the band performed directly onto a digital 2 track master.


Saturday, 26 March 2016

The Galileo 7 New single, album and French Tour 2016

Out Now - Galileo 7 single & album



The 28th of March sees the release of the new single by The Galileo 7, Cruel Bird c/w Nowhere People, the live(ish) album Live-O-Graphic closely followed by the start of a ten date French tour.



To order these please visit the Galileo 7 website http://www.thegalileo7.fourfour.com/


Tour Dates

31/03 - CAEN at Portobello Club
01/04 - ALBI at Jour de Fête
02/04 - PERPIGNAN at Vinochoppe
03/04 - TOULOUSE at La Dernière Chance
04/04 - ST ETIENNE at Thunderbird Lounge
05/04 - GRENOBLE at Maily's Club
06/04 - TOURS at Bar A Mine
07/04 - CLERMONT - FERRAND at Bombshell Club
08/04 - BOURGES at Murrayfield Pub
09/04 - LILLE at L'Imposture Bar

Also on the 30th March, will be a Galileo 7 radio take over on RCV FM, hosted by Eon Ballinger. 



Followed by a "homecoming" date at The Moth Club in London on April 16th with The Masonics & Mindreaders.

You can stay in touch with the Galileo 7 at the obligatory Facebook Page

Whilst I'll be tweeting on the road from my Twitter account @paulmossuk 
Come join me with the hashtag #G7tour


And we have badges.